At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
You sound like a Guardian reader; I hope reading road.cc isn't heuristic for leftist..
Bring back hanging!
Yeah - very noticeable when friends and I cycled the Lon Las Cymru in May. We were on segregated cycle lanes for almost all of the first day -...
13 speeds, utter madness, aimed at overweight, too-wealthy targets of the cycling industry, and nothing to do with real cycling. Why doesn't Road...
If I read any more articles trying to pretend that groupset and frame manufacturers are led by consumer demand, I think I might lose the will to...
I'm not seeing the racist bit - do you mean the use of 'gammon'? That'd be complexion-shaming, not racism.
I know more about this than most people - they could release it without Matt's consent if it was required for them to do their job (eg were you...
I've never wanted a Propel before I saw this model. LBS (Giant Leamington) posted they had one in store for the Commonwealth RR the other week..
I have to wonder if this decision would have ever been changed if the media hadn't kicked up a fuss over this. The Daily Mail did pick this up and...