Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Panaracer Agilest TLR Road Tyre



Confident and predictable yet light and fast – plus they're tough enough for winter roads
Easy to mount and inflate
Confident, predictable grip
245g Recommends

This product has been selected to feature in recommends. That means it's not just scored well, but we think it stands out as special. Go to recommends

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Panaracer Agilest TLR Folding Road Tyre is confident and predictable even on wet, messy roads, and it's robust enough to handle such winter travails too. Despite this, it's impressively light and feels fast both for acceleration and rolling speed. It's hard to say if it's really the agilest, but it's certainly among the best road bike tyres out there.

> Buy now: Panaracer Agilest TLR Folding Road Tyre for £59.99 from Panaracer

These went on my Mavic rims very easily, only needing a (plastic) lever for the last 20% or so of the second side. The beads then seated using just a regular track pump. Despite this easy fit, they also held air very well right from the first inflation. I found them a little more of a struggle on some carbon rims – I needed the lever for both sides – but it still wasn't bad, and they again seated with just a regular track pump.

Panaracer says these tyres are designed specifically for easy installation on modern rims, which includes hookless designs, and I found nothing to disprove that.

I also ran these tubed, though to be honest found no night and day difference between that and tubeless – at least, not with the pressures only 10-15psi lower without the inner tube. Either way, the ride is good, if neither especially harsh nor exceptionally plush.

If you like crazy-high pressures, though, note the maximum recommended is 95psi. Personally I ended up running them around 70-75psi, though I could probably go 10psi lower if I could just convince myself it wouldn't explode my lungs on a climb...

2022 Panaracer Agilest TLR Folding Road Tyre.jpg

Smacking them hard into hidden potholes (the tyres, not my lungs) results in a reassuringly pliant response from the sidewalls, and I have no concerns about their strength; some of my local lanes are very rough, and these dealt with what lurks beneath the sodden leaves (like the news, it's nothing good) without complaint.

2022 Panaracer Agilest TLR 2.jpeg

I didn't think the official info was that clear about what puncture protection these have, so I asked brand manager Blair Morgan – and no, it turns out there are none of the dedicated layers found in the clincher versions, which feature the likes of the 'Tough & Flex Super Belt', the 'Tough & Flex Super Outer Shield' and the 'Protite Belt.'

For this TLR version, Panaracer feels the AX-Alpha Cord casing combined with the airproof layer is thick enough to provide good protection, with any slack being taken up by the sealant. 'It is also very light,' said Morgan, 'allowing the tyre to deform in a way that maximises contact with the road.'

> 9 things they don’t tell you about tubeless tyres

Obviously there's an amount of luck involved, but I never suffered any punctures during the test, despite spending plenty of time not noticing trap-like potholes camouflaged with leaves (at least until my teeth crashed shut), and encountering fairly regular drifts of crap – hedge cuttings, storm debris from the trees, and piles of anything from the fields that will fit (briefly) into a tractor tyre.

2022 Panaracer Agilest TLR.jpeg

There's been no noticeable wear during the test (though five weeks isn't enough for that, really), but more relevantly there's no sign of damage.

As I said, these took some pretty hard hits in the lanes, but the supple yet tough-feeling response from the sidewalls under impact is impressive.

Grip in the wet from the ZSG Agilest compound is also impressive, and even on the worst surfaces – moss under trees, that plastering of soaking leaves and crunchy rural tarmac – I found them confidence inspiring enough for some pretty hard braking into corners, down steep hills and towards tractors. Sometimes all at once.

2022 Panaracer Agilest TLR centre.jpeg

The rear tyre also found excellent climbing grip on the same terrible surfaces, even up steep hairpins when out of the saddle with my weight, inevitably, shifted away from the back. Obviously they'll let go if you really provoke them, but confidence and feedback are great.

Despite the grip of the new compound (in temperatures no lower than 5°C, anyway, the coldest it got during the test period), the Agilests roll easily and never feel like they're holding you back. (Let me also apologise for writing 'Agilests', in case you don't hate language.)

Are these the agilest tyres ever? I can confidently say no, probably not, I dunno, maybe? But actually, no. No, they're not. But they steer and handle very well, with no strange quirks and a rounded profile that means the the front never feels like it's falling into corners. They spin up under acceleration easily, too. If you want a really twitchy feel you probably need something with a more triangular cross-section.

The profile is apparently more rounded than the Race series tyres that the Agilests (sorry again) have replaced, though that's more to fit better with today's wider rims than to influence steering response. They shaped up very neatly on my 19mm inner diameter/22mm OD rims, with a nice smooth transition that's no doubt aero enough to make me a stage winner (nope).

2022 Panaracer Agilest TLR profile fitted.jpeg

Our 28mm versions aired up to exactly 28mm, something I frankly found so weird I had to measure it again. They also come in 25mm and 30mm widths, and in another blow to cycling clichés, ours weighed slightly less than claimed: 245g each instead of 250g. What is the world coming to? Don't answer that.


At £59.99 these are par for the course when it comes to premium tubeless tyres. The Specialized S-Works Turbo 2BR 2Bliss Ready T2/T5 scored very highly in our test, for instance (if not as highly as in Scrabble) and is £55, while the 250g Vittoria Corsa N.Ext is £64.99 and excellent, according to Aaron's review.


Overall, these are lovely tyres – light and fast, confidence inspiring even on bad roads, tough enough to cope with winter, and easy to get onto modern rims. They also then sit with a very nice profile. If you're looking at premium rubber and happy to pay for it, they should have a place on your list.


Confident and predictable yet light and fast – plus they're tough enough for winter roads test report

Make and model: Panaracer Agilest TLR Folding Road Tyre

Size tested: 700 x 28

Tell us what the product is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Panaracer says:

The TLR is the Tubeless Ready model of the Agilest range. The 'Panaracer Ratio' is in full effect with this tyre. ZSG Agile Compound has been combined with the super supple Advanced Extra Alpha Cord to deliver a grippy low rolling resistance supple ride.

The bead has been designed with consideration around current rim profiles including hookless beads for ease of installation specifically around mounting and inflating.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

From Panaracer:






Recommended kPa

Max 650

Recommended PSI

Max 95

Rate the product for quality of construction:
Rate the product for performance:
Rate the product for durability:
Rate the product for weight (if applicable)
Rate the product for comfort (if applicable)
Rate the product for value:

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

Very well – they're confident and quick even in far-from-ideal conditions.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

Pretty easy to fit, light, fast rolling but predictably grippy.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

Nothing really.

How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on

It's bang on for mainstream premium tubeless.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Yes

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes

Use this box to explain your overall score

These are excellent: light, fast-rolling and grippy wet or dry, with a confident feel and neutral steering characteristics. They're also tough enough for winter roads and the price, if not cheap, is bang in line with the competition.

Overall rating: 9/10

About the tester

Age: 48  Height: 183cm  Weight: 78kg

I usually ride: Vitus Zenium SL VR Disc  My best bike is:

I've been riding for: 10-20 years  I ride: A few times a week  I would class myself as: Experienced

I regularly do the following types of riding: general fitness riding, mtb,

Add new comment


Freddy56 | 1 year ago

Was a massive fan of Panaracer tyres, super wear to grip ratio. These are priced a bit high for my budget. A new tyre on the wife's car was £52 yesterday - fitted.

I reckon the tyre weighed 20kgs and was made in India. So work take off the Vat and we are at £40. Say £15 profit for sale and fitting and we are at £25. Distributor £5, shipping £5 and it leaves the factory at £ profit.

We cyclists are being marketed to poverty.

mark1a replied to Freddy56 | 1 year ago

£52 net of 20% VAT is £43.33. Back to your point though, I think some other considerations would be the different economies of scale making a difference to manufacturing and R&D costs for car & bicycle tyres. At the end of the day we'll get fleeced for as long as we're prepared to pay, although I notice of late that my preferred road bike tyre Continental GP5000 is starting to creep back down to their pre-2020 discounted price level. 

RoubaixCube replied to mark1a | 1 year ago

I share your view on the GP5000. I have seen them at £60-70 per tyre and that is simply too rich for my blood. But then CRC dropped the price to £33 as part of a christmas sale and i jumped on it and bought a few to use as summer tyres.

I checked about 3 or 4 other retailers before my purchase and they were still selling around the £50-70 mark. Ive now noticed that Wiggle has dropped their price to match CRC but i dont know since when. But im sure they profited off people not checking prices at other retailers first.

Im sure a lot of R&D goes into the tyres but youre paying the price of a car tyre while getting only 5-10% of said tyre back in return.


But then again. these are some of the best in the business. but still stupidly priced. (IMO)

Miller replied to RoubaixCube | 1 year ago
1 like
RoubaixCube wrote:

I've now noticed that Wiggle has dropped their price to match CRC but i dont know since when.

Wiggle and CRC are the same company these days.

RoubaixCube replied to Miller | 1 year ago

I am well aware of this. but even so. They dont all match each others promotions/offers at the same time. Thats just how business works.

KeithBird replied to Freddy56 | 1 year ago
1 like

I recently fitted a set of Conti Sport 7 to my car, a closer comparison to this level of tyre. They were £120 each with a bit of discount.


IanEdward replied to Freddy56 | 1 year ago

I reckon the tyre weighed 20kgs

There's your answer probably, if the Panaracer tyre above weighed even 200g more we'd all be horrified and it would probably never sell. Likewise I wonder what the tolerances are in car tyres, if there was a 2mm difference between two bike tyres that were otherwise labelled as the same size it would be considered poor QC.

Also you're not comparing apples with apples, e.g. I turned down a cheap, wire beaded 'generic' compound version of my favourite CX tyre at £16 because I wanted the same performance I was used to from the £50 tubeless/grapheme compound equivalent. Your car tyre analogy might be better comparing to a high end all conditions tyre like Keithbird mentioned

Latest Comments