Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

TECH NEWS

Apple looks to add cycling power measurement feature to Apple Watch

Theory is based on a lot of estimates so we don’t think SRM needs to worry just yet

Apple has applied for a US patent that could add a cycling power output function to its Apple Watch. The US brand says that measuring heart rate, position and orientation, velocity, altitude and riding position will allow it to estimate a cyclist's total power output.

Apple filed an application titled ‘Calculating an Estimate of Wind Resistance Experienced by a Cyclist’ in September last year.

Essentially – and we’re summarising a 6,800 word document here – Apple is looking at estimates for the various sources of resistance experienced by a cyclist, and thus at the total power output of the rider. 

“Estimates of the wind resistance experienced by a cyclist can be obtained through calibration of the effective resistance a cyclist experiences as a function of heading, and thereby separated from the effective resistance due to rolling resistance and grade,” says Apple. “Once such estimates are obtained, the user's total power output can be more accurately tracked throughout an activity.”

Apple Watch SS - 1.jpg

Prepare yourself for repeated use of the phrase ‘wearable device’, possibly more than you’ve experienced in your life up until this point. What Apple has in mind is an Apple Watch. 

“The wearable device can include a heart rate sensor to provide a series of measurements of cyclist heart rate. The wearable device can also include motion sensors to collect data about the wearable device's position and orientation in space and to track changes to the wearable device's position and orientation over time. 

“Accelerometers in the device may track acceleration, including high frequency variation in acceleration, and use this to detect surface type. Because a cyclist can wear the wearable device, the orientation of the device can provide information about the cyclist's body position. 

“For example, when cycling, the cyclist's arms may be in a variety of positions, depending on the cyclist's style of riding and the type of handlebars on the bicycle. If the cyclist wears the wearable device on the cyclist's wrist, the wearable device may be able to infer the cyclist's hand position, and based on this hand position may be able to infer the cyclist's riding position and thereby provide an estimate of drag contributed by the cyclist's body.”

Alright, alright! There’s a lot going on there. As anyone with a conventional power meter knows, a higher heart rate doesn’t always mean a higher power output. And if your hands are on the drops your body is likely to be positioned in such a way that you’ll experience less air resistance than if your hands are on the hoods (see figures below), but not necessarily. 

Apple Watch power - 3.jpg

Anyway, we’re getting to the crux of the matter so you’d better concentrate.

“Combining these measurements of heart rate, position and orientation, velocity, altitude, and riding position, the cyclist's total power output and the contribution of each component of that power output may be estimated,” says Apple. “By estimating the relative contribution of each component to total power output, a less expensive and more power-efficient technique for providing accurate estimates of cyclist power output can be created.”

Okay, so that’s the theory, but how accurate is accurate? At this stage, we don’t think that SRM or PowerTap have too much to worry about because it certainly doesn’t sound to us as if Apple is going to end up with precise, consistent power figures using these estimates. But who knows? 

Will this power output function ever see the light of day? We just don’t know. Apple, like many other technology companies, applies for (and is granted) loads of patents that never actually make it out into the real world along with many that do, so we’ll all just have to wait and see.

It’s US Patent Application 20170074897 if you want to check it out yourself. Be warned, it’s heavy going in parts!

Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

Add new comment

13 comments

Avatar
Team EPO | 7 years ago
0 likes

They need to improve the performance of the optical HR first

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjDKCrUfoc8

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 7 years ago
0 likes

Good lord, look at the rake on those forks in the top diagram!

And having no seat tube and the bottom bracket halfway between handlebars and seat(assuming it is in the normal position at the end of the down tube) will make pedalling interesting.

Given they can't even draw a diamond framed bike with any level of precision, I wouldn't trust the "wearable device" to give readings of any precision either. 

Avatar
RobD | 7 years ago
0 likes

Would a barometer not make much of the estimation regarding wind resistance more accurate?

I know there's all kinds of factors such as clothing drag etc that they can never really get very accurate (although some benchmarked estimates would help) but getting an app to work out your frontal area on the bike in each positions through a photo at a distance would make this a little more accurate too?

I know it's never going to be as accurate as a powermeter, but as an add on function to a preexisting piece of technology it might be cool - assuming it was refined enough.

Avatar
DaveE128 | 7 years ago
2 likes

I can't see trying to distinguish riding on the hoods from riding the drops being terribly reliable based only on wrist position.

The headline is wrong. This isn't "power measurement" this is "power estimation". Clickbait?!

The cynic in me can't help thinking that this is just a publicity piece from Apple!

Avatar
part_robot | 7 years ago
0 likes

So they've attempted to patent 1st year engineer degree mathematics?

Avatar
BBB | 7 years ago
0 likes

Taking body position and road surface into account makes is potentially significantly better than other existing power "estimators".

Avatar
Man of Lard | 7 years ago
1 like

Remember this is the US Patent Office - http://www.google.co.uk/patents/US4022227 - they allowed that, the combover. They have form for allowing patents when there is prima facie prior art that should preclude it.

Avatar
Jonathan Knight replied to Man of Lard | 7 years ago
0 likes

Man of Lard wrote:

Remember this is the US Patent Office - http://www.google.co.uk/patents/US4022227 - they allowed that, the combover. They have form for allowing patents when there is prima facie prior art that should preclude it.

I'm pretty sure also that in the U.S. you just have to be first to file then you get to fight it out in court later. That is why the U.S. based software company I work for pays a bonus for every patent application that we file.

Avatar
mrml replied to Jonathan Knight | 7 years ago
0 likes

Jonathan Knight wrote:

Man of Lard wrote:

Remember this is the US Patent Office - http://www.google.co.uk/patents/US4022227 - they allowed that, the combover. They have form for allowing patents when there is prima facie prior art that should preclude it.

I'm pretty sure also that in the U.S. you just have to be first to file then you get to fight it out in court later. That is why the U.S. based software company I work for pays a bonus for every patent application that we file.

 

The USPTO does examine patent applications on merit, and should not grant patents for inventions unless they are new and non-obvious over earlier publicly-available material that is available to the examiners.

 

But yes, some poor-quality patents do get through the net (out of about 300,000 per year).  

 

 

Avatar
Boss Hogg | 7 years ago
3 likes

Doesn't sound particularly reliable...

Avatar
Dr_Lex | 7 years ago
1 like

Shirley iPed L?

Avatar
STiG911 replied to Dr_Lex | 7 years ago
0 likes

Dr_Lex wrote:

Shirley iPed L?

Good one.

 

And don't call me Shirley.

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 7 years ago
1 like

Powerpod?

Latest Comments