SRAM has launched a new rear derailleur for its top-level Red eTap AXS wireless groupset which can work with cassettes that have a maximum sprocket size of 36 teeth.
SRAM introduced a rear derailleur with a 36-tooth maximum in its next-level-down Force eTap AXS last year.
Read our review of the SRAM Force eTap AXS Wide groupset
Until now the maximum number of teeth a SRAM Red eTap AXS rear derailleur could handle was 33.
SRAM isn’t introducing a new Red-level cassette but the SRAM RED eTap AXS 36T Max rear derailleur works with the existing Force XG-1270 10-36T cassette (£170), and with cassette sizes down to 10-28T. These cassettes require an XDR driver body. The new rear derailleur isn’t compatible with SRAM’s 10-26-tooth cassette – the Force version of which is being phased out, the Red version remaining in the range – but it can be used with both single (1x) and double (2x) chainsets.
The SRAM RED eTap AXS 36T Max rear derailleur is only compatible with SRAM AXS systems. It will communicate with AXS front derailleurs, drop bar shift levers, BlipBoxes, and controllers. It is not backwards compatible with SRAM RED eTap 11-speed components; they are not able to communicate with each other.
The drivetrain tooth capacity (the difference between largest/smallest tooth numbers on chainrings added to the difference between largest/smallest tooth numbers on cassette cogs) for the SRAM RED eTap AXS 36T Max rear derailleurs is 39T. This means that if you use a 10-36-tooth cassette the maximum difference you can have between chainrings is 13-teeth – so 43/30T, 46/33T, 48/35T, and 50/37T chainsets are all open to you.
The idea of the new derailleur is, of course, to give you an easier low gear. Combined with a 33-tooth chainring and a 700C x 32mm tyre, for example, a 36-tooth cog will give you 24.85 gear inches, whereas it’s 27.01 gear inches with a 33-tooth cog.
For comparison, the lowest gear that you can currently get with Shimano’s top-end Dura-Ace groupset is 34 x 30 (30-tooth is the largest a Dura-Ace rear derailleur can handle and the largest sprocket size on any Dura-Ace cassette). Using a 700C x 32mm tyre, this combo would give you 30.52 gear inches. Shimano is widely expected to release a new version of Dura-Ace later this year.
“The benefit of a larger maximum cassette size will allow for a greater gear range while also offering closer gear steps across the cassette for maintaining a comfortable cadence,” says SRAM.
“With a 46/33T crankset paired with a 10-36T cassette, you achieve 502% gear range with a sub 1:1 gear ratio (.92). With a 48/35T crankset, you have a 494% gear range yet still reach sub 1:1 gear ratio (.97).”
The new rear derailleur is very similar to the existing SRAM RED eTap AXS design so, for example, it includes the Orbit silicone fluid damper with a one-way valve that controls the rear derailleur cage's anti-clockwise rotation. This stops the lower pulley from moving forward when uneven road surfaces lead to the chain being pulled downward.
The frame fit specification for the SRAM RED eTap AXS 36T rear derailleur is the same as the existing 33T Max model. If you make the switch to a larger cassette size you’ll obviously need a longer chain.
SRAM says that the introduction of this new rear derailleur was driven by demand from consumers and OEM (original equipment manufacturer; the products specced on complete bikes), with people looking for more capable and versatile drop handlebar bikes. Trek will offer it as an option if you buy a bike through its Project One programme, for instance.
Force cassettes are now changing to a nickel-chrome finish, although the aluminium largest sprocket will remain grey/black.
The SRAM Red eTap AXS 36T Max rear derailleur (part number 00.7518.153.000) works with the SRAM AXS App and is priced £610. The battery (which is the same as an existing AXS battery) isn’t included. Assuming that deliveries have gone as expected in the current climate, the new rear derailleur is available from today.
I'm glad cyclists are required to dismount - mean phew! right?
There are situations where I don't mind being passed at a distance that is too close legally. A difficult road to pass on for long stretches, and a...
I really am an advocate for leather saddles. Initially expensive maybe, they do have a break in period but are then comfortable and last literally...
"I got cancelled..."...
Have raised crossings been considered anywhere, and would that improve perceived safety by blind people? Cyclists would have to bump over a raised...
it's also a specific offence under POFA2012
Maybe this one can be put down to "it's the culture"? Never been to Japan but I was in Korea for a little while - a society which has some...
Rochdale is a deeply unpleasant town to cycle around, let alone walk. It's full of terraced streets chock full of parked cars. Massive 20th...
I've found from my unscientific survey of five sets of bibs and biblongs that some of the simplest pads are the best for me. So I've found a pair...
Bikehike is good, but for all my routes both cycling and walking I use Komoot which is pretty good.