Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

One in three people in UK could switch from driving to cycling or walking

Cycling UK survey also finds that 2 in 3 want to see dedicated cycle paths

A new survey has found that one in three people in the UK say they could switch from driving to cycling or walking as a means of getting around once the lockdown is lifted – but they are also calling for safer streets.

The survey, commissioned by Cycling UK from YouGov, revealed that 36 per cent of participants agreed that in future, they could change their travel habits to use cars and other motor vehicles less.

It also found that around one in ten – 9 per cent of respondents, and equivalent to around 6 million people – have been riding bikes more since the COVID-19 crisis began.

The survey, conducted online on 27 and 28 April, polled 2,131 adults aged 18+ with responses weighted to reflect the UK population as a whole.

Traffic-free cycle paths and tracks were cited as the most important measure to encourage people to keep cycling once the current crisis has passed, attracting 63 per cent support.

Meanwhile, 53 per cent of respondents wanted to see more designated cycle lanes on roads, 30 per cent called for traffic restrictions on residential streets, and 24 per cent said that a speed limit of 20mph should be imposed in residential and built-up areas.

Duncan Dollimore, Cycling UK’s head of campaigns, said: “Our poll shows clearly that people are prepared to rethink their travel habits, using their cars less and cycling more, but only if they feel safe to do so.

“The Prime Minister said this should be the golden age for cycling, while the Transport Secretary announced major funding to encourage more people to cycle as an alternative to public transport.

> Government announces £250m emergency active travel fund as part of £2bn investment

“But encouragement is not enough. If the roads don’t look and feel safe to cycle, only the brave will choose to do so. If there’s space for people to cycle separated from motor vehicles, millions more will do it.

“That’s why we’re calling on local authorities to act now to install pop-up cycle lanes and widen pavements to create the space for people to walk and cycle safely while social distancing.”

He added: “Money has been made available for them to do this in England and Scotland, and has been promised in Wales, with every government in the UK sending a clear message that more people cycling and walking is fundamental to the exit strategy from this crisis and central to how we do things differently in the future.”

The charity has been campaigning for pop-up cycle lanes to be introduced in towns and cities across the UK, including encouraging people to write to their local authorities to call for safe infrastructure to be introduced during the crisis.

Cycling UK has been campaigning for local authorities to introduce pop-up cycle lanes across the UK to help key workers travel to work safely and avoid public transport, and has seen more than 6,000 people write to their local council in support of this initiative.

> Pop-up cycle lanes: what’s happening near you?

In partnership with academics at Leeds University, it also identified 100 streets in 10 cities - London, Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, Liverpool, Bristol, Leicester, Sheffield, Newcastle and Cambridge – where separated cycle lanes would enable millions of workers to commute safely by bike.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

12 comments

Avatar
Hirsute | 3 years ago
0 likes

Meanwhile

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52708687

The latest government survey data before lockdown, however, showed three in five people thought cycling on the road was too dangerous - 61%.

Avatar
Gary's bike channel | 3 years ago
0 likes

but they'll just do the same thing again, cheap out and put us with pedestrians. Might not be an issue for someone getting about town instead of driving, who maxes at maybe 10 mph. But they need to consider faster riders too. If i want to cycle at 40 mph i should be able to without having to worry about pedestrians. Yoyu can't just mix faster cyclists and people who have barely cycled in their life in one lane and expect them to get along. Even worse if you try to do so on  whats clearly a pavement. 

Avatar
Pilot Pete replied to Gary's bike channel | 3 years ago
5 likes

Why can't you just cycle in the road if you are doing 40mph? 

Avatar
Sniffer replied to Pilot Pete | 3 years ago
2 likes

I'd be going pro if I could cycle at 40mph.  They close the roads for your races.

Avatar
rayjay | 3 years ago
1 like

They "could " but , they won't . 

Avatar
Sriracha replied to rayjay | 3 years ago
3 likes
rayjay wrote:

They "could " but , they won't . 

It's about reducing the reasons underlying "won't". I won't cycle to Lidl because there is nowhere low-risk and convenient to park my bike. Many won't cycle in 'normal' times because it's just too scary. These things can be fixed, if there is a durable will.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to rayjay | 3 years ago
4 likes

rayjay wrote:

They "could " but , they won't . 

Well done.  Something that makes sense and is mercifully short.  Do keep it up, but shorter if possible please.

Avatar
RicePudding | 3 years ago
1 like

I can't help but feel like "pop-up cycle lanes" are all well and good but it seems like doing half a job.

If people are asking for dedicated cycle paths then they should outline a plan to change the country's infrastructure for a more permanent system and prioritise active travel.

The pop-up cycle lanes aren't really going to give this idea a fair shot, it's just going to get forgotten when all of this blows over and roads will remain how they are. A bunch of traffic cones are always only going to be a temporary solution.

Avatar
ktache replied to RicePudding | 3 years ago
3 likes

Thing is, some (and probably only a small some) 'might' become more permanent if they are seen to work.  I'm not holding my breath though...

Avatar
Philh68 replied to RicePudding | 3 years ago
8 likes

On the contrary, pop up cycle lanes fall into the category of tactical urbanism. Instead of having to go through endless studies and committees and then convince car-centric transport planners that it could work, it just says "we have an immediate need for this so let's bypass all the usual bureaucracy and just try it out". If it doesn't work, no big deal, it's easy to revert. If it does work, you have just bypassed all the debate and can move straight onto designing a permanent solution.

These live trials are highly beneficial if you monitor the impacts ie how much mode shift is achieved and how it changes traffic flow. Real world data beats modelling.

The problem cycling faces is that it always requires proof to justify itself, and the present circumstances are providing the opportunity to sidestep the usual obstacles and provide it. That is immensely useful. And it's a two-prong boost, as under the guise of social distancing it reallocates road space from cars and users from public transport. When the alternatives are unattractive - infection risk on public transport or increased traffic congestion and limited parking - it's practically designed to succeed. So while permanent solutions are preferable, don't discount the value of the trial nature of pop up infra. Once the public have been given something they like, it's very hard politically to take it back.

Avatar
Awavey replied to Philh68 | 3 years ago
0 likes

but to show they are beneficial you need to have monitored the impact before you made the change,else what are you comparing against ? you end up with councils picking essentially quiteway roads, that already were attractive for cycling/pedestrians compared to the horrendous motor filled roads parallel to them, running their experiment and claiming it as a great success, whilst quietly hoping no-one notices the sleight of hand involved.

which isnt that much different to asking just 2000 people their views on bicycles, and suggesting it clearly shows 6million are champing at the bit to ride their bikes on the roads.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to Awavey | 3 years ago
0 likes

Pollution, congestion and transport modal share are measured routinely in most cities.

Latest Comments