Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Reading Council to remove door zone bike lanes at a cost of £30,000

Campaigners call the u-turn vote by councillors a momentous moment in its long history

Two cycle lanes in Reading branded 'dangerous' and worse than no cycle lanes are being removed at a cost of £30,000 to the council.

The cycle lanes, on Lower Henley Road and Wokingham Road, were paid for by Local Sustainable Transport Fund money, but were placed directly alongside parking bays with no buffer zone so when a car door opens it obstructs the whole bike lane. Councillors voted to remove the lanes at a Traffic Management Sub-Committee meeting on Wednesday following complaints and an appeal by Reading Cycle Campaign.

Reading Cycle Campaign has called the u-turn a momentous landmark in its long history, and a hopeful sign the council will design better infrastructure in future. However, it questions why the cycle lanes were lacking the buffer zone it says the council had agreed to include.

Adrian Lawson, Reading Cycle Campaign, said: "This is only a partial success story because as far as we know they are going to remove the cycle lanes and leave the cycle symbols on the road, which from the point of view of an experienced cyclist is probably better but it's not going to help people who are currently not confident cycling in traffic."

Looks like the dangerous Wokingham road and Lower Henley road cycle lanes will be removed. Better no cycle lanes than...

Posted by Reading Cycle Campaign on Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Reading Borough Council has told people to check their mirrors before opening car doors onto the bike lanes, but as Lawson points out, the curve of the Lower Henley Road bike lane (pictured below) puts riders in parked vehicles' blind spots.

Lawson says early plans for Wokingham Road, without the buffer zone, were met with 'unanimous condemnation' from campaigners, and the plans were changed to introduce the buffer. However Lawson said when the lanes appeared the buffer had gone. Lawson said on Lower Henley Road the paint seemed to go around whatever cars happened to be parked there at the time, including around informal parking bays with wide pavements he says could have been converted to car parking.

 

Lower Henley Road bike lane

Both the council's cycling strategy and government guidelines state cycle lanes should have a buffer zone of  0.5-1m to protect cyclists from car doors, but where that is not possible the central white line will be removed instead.

Wokingham Road bike lane

Lawson said: "There is a fundamental point here: the Department for Transport produces these guidelines and local authorities ignore them. What is the point of doing these guidelines when councils can do exactly what they like?"

However Lawson says there is a silver lining, and the fact of the u-turn may signal a change of heart in the council.

"That is actually momentous - in all the years of campaigning we have never got the council to overturn a bad decision until now so it is actually a very important milestone for us and we think it could be the beginning of something a lot better.

"The noise that we have made is now so loud that the council will listen to us; the noise comes when they design these half-baked cycle schemes."

Add new comment

12 comments

Avatar
LastBoyScout | 6 years ago
1 like

This just came up in a search for something else.

I can confirm the lanes are still there on Wokingham Road...

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to LastBoyScout | 5 years ago
0 likes
LastBoyScout wrote:

This just came up in a search for something else. I can confirm the lanes are still there on Wokingham Road...

They've made a half-arsed attempt at burning the paint off, it basically still looks the same unless you inspect the paint closely.
I've had two horrific experiences almost exactly where the pics were taken and a friend was doored outside the shops further back, punctured a lung etc and had weeks off work. Driver blamed the cyclist, not sure how that works.

TVP couldn't be bothered... "Nothing we can do".

It transpired a few weeks later, through a friend who was chatting in one of the shops, someone who works there witnessed the whole thing. Apparently, attempting to identify any witnesses is below TVP's give-a-f*ck threshold for cyclists.

Avatar
earth | 8 years ago
0 likes

You don't get this in Majorca. People don't park by the side of the road because there is a specific segregated lane for loading and unloading.

Avatar
KnightBiker | 8 years ago
0 likes

Just cycled from Harwich to Reading last week, on my way to wales. cycling paths like these aplenty, but indeed dangerous and not consistently there.
Segregated cycle paths is what is needed, or at least cycle paths that have danger only coming from one side. In holland most cycle paths are also 2 cycles wide.

The problem is that most cycling infrastructure in England is just a lick of paint onto existing roads, almost no real investment in good cycling paths seems to be done.
also most directions are rather bad, mainly for cars, forcing cyclists to follow car roads, while a road cycling directions system could easily direct most cycle traffic to the more quite roads rather then the same routes that cars predominantly ride take. (this would be a relatively small investment)

Avatar
antonyr5 replied to KnightBiker | 8 years ago
1 like

I think I met you on your way to Reading last week, joining you at Twyford and taking you through Sonning and Caversham on your way to Reading station.

I hope you enjoyed the cycling in Wales.

Avatar
KnightBiker replied to antonyr5 | 8 years ago
1 like

Hi Antonyr - yes i did enjoy wales, though next time i'll opt for something further out of town, Newport is a boring place and it takes time and local knowledge to get out of, still plenty of climbing from there on.

Thnx for the little help, i was happy riding on someones wheel for the last 15/20 km! more then 11 hours on the bike that day  1 Much appreciated!

Avatar
Stef Marazzi | 8 years ago
0 likes

I hope this sets a precedent for councils around the UK

Avatar
paulrbarnard | 8 years ago
2 likes

So are they repaying the sustainable transport fund then? What are they going to spend that money on instead?

Avatar
ron611087 | 8 years ago
2 likes

That cycle lane was a double insult. The first is the risk that it exposed cyclists to, the second is that fact that it was funded from the sustainable transport fund. We get less than 0.7% of the road budget, and that's how they spend it!

The proper solution would be to turn the on-street parking into a segregated lane.

Avatar
Housecathst replied to ron611087 | 8 years ago
1 like
ron611087 wrote:

That cycle lane was a double insult. The first is the risk that it exposed cyclists to, the second is that fact that it was funded from the sustainable transport fund. We get less than 0.7% of the road budget, and that's how they spend it!

The proper solution would be to turn the on-street parking into a segregated lane.

What's the betting that the £30k to remove it will come from the sustainable transport fund too.

Avatar
joe-irish | 8 years ago
1 like

If only you could educate them about the door zone then make them ride 1km in it. They need to feel the fear or they'll do nothing.
Its definitely a start getting the lanes moved but what the heck is the point when they leave the bikes on the buffer zone!

Avatar
Fifth Gear | 8 years ago
2 likes

The lanes are also too narrow at 1.2m and even less at some points. The answer is to remove the car parking completely and install 1.5m mandatory cycle lanes. Despite the fact that Reading Borough Council states in its Cycling Strategy that it will prioritise cycling over motor vehicle use, this is something that council officers will not even contemplate.

Latest Comments