Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Councils get new powers to fine drivers parking in bike lanes

Local authorities will be able to use CCTV to catch law-breaking motorists from 22 June

The Department for Transport (DfT) has announced today that local authorities in England will be able to use CCTV to fine drivers who park or load illegally in mandatory cycle lanes, putting cyclists at risk.

In a statement issued today, the DfT said:

 

Cars parked on cycle lanes pose problems for cyclists, often forcing them into the flow of traffic. With approved camera devices, it will be easier for those local authorities with civil parking enforcement powers to take action against cars illegally parked on mandatory cycle lanes, allowing cyclists to complete their journeys without deviating from their path.  

Cycling Minister Chris Heaton-Harris said:  “Across the country there has been a surge in the number of people dusting off their old bike from the back of the shed and cycling, or taking journeys on foot, to get from A to B.  

“Giving local authorities more powers to stop cycle lanes from becoming blocked will make it safer for cyclists. 

“These new measures also build on our recent £2bn investment to create a green, healthier legacy and see more people travelling by bicycle or on foot.”  

The DfT has previously announced a £225 million fund for councils in England to put emergency infrastructure in place for active travel.

It has also announced a £25 million 'Fix Your Bike' fund, which will see 500,000 bicycle repair vouchers issued, worth £50 each, with full details of that scheme due later this month.

Fines for the offence will remain at a maximum of £130 in London, and £70 elsewhere.

The measures announced today, under a statutory instrument laid down on 29 May that comes into force on 22 June, apply to mandatory cycle lanes, that is, ones demarcated by a solid white line, which motorists must not drive or park.

Advisory cycle lanes, by contrast, are marked by a broken white line, and motorists can drive or park their vehicles in them, but only when “unavoidable,” according to the Highway Code.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

18 comments

Avatar
wknight | 3 years ago
0 likes

  

Avatar
wknight | 3 years ago
0 likes

A

Avatar
wknight | 3 years ago
0 likes

Anyone who fails to pay a council ticket will find themselves in the Magistrates Court where the local council prosecute you. It then becomes a court order to pay and failure to pay a Magistrates court fine can land you in prison. 

Note the process is very different on private land where it is a civil matter. Moral of the story, the council has way more powers for enforcement then many people realise. 

Avatar
RoryLydiate | 3 years ago
2 likes

In many cases I've seen cars parked in cycle lanes there has been no need for a new law, or a solid white line, as there were already a double yellow line by the kerb. What was needed was someone to enforce it.

Avatar
Prosper0 | 3 years ago
3 likes

Good, but meaningless. The vast magority of cycle lanes are dashed line advisory, which amazingly are completely fine to park in. 

Avatar
cycle.london | 3 years ago
4 likes

It matters not an f*** what the councils can do.  If they start to fine people, the tabloids will get hold of it, and they'll trot out the favourite right-wing fantasy of 'war on the motorist'.  There will then be an article on Mail Online, featuring a somewhat attractive, white woman in her mid-twenties, standing next to her car and holding a FPN in front of her, whilst she does her best to look put-out and upset.  Expect the article to feature the words 'fury', 'outrage' and 'cash cow' prominently.  

One of the council's Tory members will then be quoted as promising to bring this up at the next council meeting, adding, 'Motorists are already paying through the nose for their right to use the roads, and this is just another example of how the socialists in our town think that taking other people's money, is the best way to tackle inequality'. 

And so it goes.  

Avatar
Cargobike | 3 years ago
4 likes

Only applies to fixed white line lanes which are few and far between outside of major cities. Here in Derby there are only a handful of lanes that can be enforced even though the council do have a camera car available if needed.

I can't see it making the slightest bit of difference to motorists attitudes around here.

Avatar
0-0 | 3 years ago
1 like

The £25 million 'Fix Your Bike' fund.

Can I claim some of that £25 Million, if my bike gets damaged, or if I get constantly annoyed from having to ride over/through the pot holes that council never bothers to fix?
I settle for £25,000  3

Avatar
Sriracha | 3 years ago
1 like

Other than the car or driver becoming incapacitated, under what circumstances is parking a car in a particular spot "unavoidable"? Surely it is always possible to just keep moving?

Avatar
Bob's Bikes | 3 years ago
1 like

Unfortunately the catch here is in the statement " With approved camera devices, it will be easier for those local authorities with civil parking enforcement powers"

So only if the/your local council has civil parking enforcement powers (apparently not all do even though police fob off pavement parking as a civil matter (nuffin to do wif me)) and then has bought these specially approved cameras and can be arsed to actually use them the status quo remains, Slough BC have a parking enforcement car with cameras on it's roof but obviously they will not pay evening or weekend rates to the driver so fairly useless.

They need to amend the law so they can accept bike/dash cam footage.

Avatar
peted76 replied to Bob's Bikes | 3 years ago
0 likes

Bob's Bikes wrote:

Unfortunately the catch here is in the statement " With approved camera devices, it will be easier for those local authorities with civil parking enforcement powers"

So only if the/your local council has civil parking enforcement powers (apparently not all do even though police fob off pavement parking as a civil matter (nuffin to do wif me)) and then has bought these specially approved cameras and can be arsed to actually use them the status quo remains, Slough BC have a parking enforcement car with cameras on it's roof but obviously they will not pay evening or weekend rates to the driver so fairly useless.

They need to amend the law so they can accept bike/dash cam footage.

If that is the case, then I'd imagine outside of London it's pretty much useless. OR will simply result in some prohibitively expensive third party contractors being involved to install, maintain and monitor the cameras as well as probably taking a % of the actual fines. That's all very depressing. 

I wonder if there's a car lobby'ist type was responsobile for that particular wording in the statement. It's difficult not to be cynical about this supposedly good news, which possibly turns out to be not much more than fake news as Mr Trump might say.

Avatar
peted76 replied to peted76 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Turns out that 90%+ of councils use civil enforcement powers.

From 2015 .gov - The majority of local authorities (around 90%) have adopted civil parking enforcement powers which now operate under Part 6 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 which came into effect in 2008.1 This means that parking offences on public roads are not dealt with by the police but by local authorities and, if necessary, by independent traffic tribunals which hear appeals. 

Avatar
peted76 replied to peted76 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Turns out that 90%+ of councils use civil enforcement powers.

From 2015 .gov - The majority of local authorities (around 90%) have adopted civil parking enforcement powers which now operate under Part 6 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 which came into effect in 2008.1 This means that parking offences on public roads are not dealt with by the police but by local authorities and, if necessary, by independent traffic tribunals which hear appeals. 

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
1 like

I'm almost starting to believe that the government means it this time.

Avatar
David9694 replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
5 likes

Acceptable excuses:

"it was only for a minute"

Hazard flashers

Avatar
brooksby replied to David9694 | 3 years ago
1 like

Ah, but flashing orange hazard lights grant you something akin to diplomatic immunity from all parking restrictions.  Didn't you know that?   3

Avatar
David9694 replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
1 like

Doesn't it beam the vehicle into another dinension, where no road traffic laws apply? 

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to David9694 | 3 years ago
0 likes

"I left the engine running"

Latest Comments