The Mail Online has been accused of misrepresenting the situation in Regent’s Park, where the newspaper claims dozens of cyclists are ignoring the Government's Covid-19 lockdown rules by riding in large groups. The “MAMIL madness” article, published today, comes after campaigners have warned that cycling could be banned if people don’t ride responsibly.
In the early days of the coronavirus lockdown, a number of cyclists chose to ignore the Prime Minister's instructions on social distancing and continued to ride in groups and meet in cafes for a mid-ride chat.
While things have improved since, yesterday (Friday) Cycling UK reminded cyclists to ride responsibly over the weekend to avoid a ban similar to those in force in a number of countries on the continent.
A week earlier, British Cycling had made a similar plea, warning that the ‘privilege’ of riding a bike could be removed if people fail to observe instructions on social distancing.
The Mail Online story, headlined “MAMIL madness: Cyclists ride close together through Regents Park in London” plays on these concerns.
The clumsily written piece says: “In London's Regent Park, dozens of 'Middle-Aged Men in Lycra' (MAMILs) ignored the Government's Covid-19 lockdown rules to congregate in Regent's Park in London to ride their bicycles in large groups.
“Groups of men, clad in lycra, riding in close formation. Across in Paddington, keep fit fans were photographed training in a recreation ground – again ignoring social distancing rules.”
The piece is accompanied by photographs local cyclists say have been carefully selected - perhaps even deliberately shot - to give a false representation of what is happening in and around the park.
Regent’s Park Cyclists, the group set up to represent cyclists who ride and train on the roads within the park, tweeted:
Local cyclist, The Dynaslow, who posted the original tweet, added:
Regent’s Park Cyclists have posted a whole series of tweets reminding people how to ride responsibly at the moment.
10 of the most hysterical anti-cycling Daily Mail headlines
Went (by bike!) to their site on the east side of Rotherham, yesterday, to pick up a 'click and collect' order. (It saves the delivery charges:...
I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter what you wear. If they think you have held them up then you are fair game to be taught a lesson....
We all know that the pro bike / race situation is very different than consumer sitautions, so odd that articles are still over-relating the two......
A link to the crowdfunding would be useful
The thing that puts me off a single front ring setup is I ride such a varied type of terrain. I could be on a very flat ride one day but the next...
As an Australian, motorists there view cyclists that don't wear helmets as law-breaking bogans and likely to ride unsafely in traffic, so they do...
I'd always had good results with the Park glueless patches, until I tried using them on holiday in really hot weather. Then they didn't stick at...
As it should be - what a fantatsic outcome.
IMHO there is a huge issue that we seem to allow that argument (nobody got hurt) in some cases for criminal liability...
I'm struggling to see the justification now (if there ever was one) for having separate categories of offence for injuries/deaths caused using a...