The US-based Cynisca Cycling team has parted ways with its board member Inga Thompson, a former world championship silver medallist and Tour de France Féminin podium finisher who in recent years has campaigned for the exclusion of transgender athletes from elite women’s cycling, after the three-time Olympian called on riders to “take the knee” in protest against the UCI’s trans policy.
In October, Thompson, who also won five US national road race titles in the 1980s and early 1990s, joined the board of directors at Cynisca Cycling, a new UCI Continental Women’s team based in France and formed for 2023 in partnership with USA Cycling to develop young American talent.
The 59-year-old has been one of the most vocal critics in recent years of transgender women participating in female events, and in 2019 resigned from Oregon Bicycling Racing Association’s board of directors following a backlash over an interview she gave to Save Women’s Sports, in which she called for the creation of a separate racing category for trans cyclists.
Earlier this week, in the wake of Austin Killips’ overall victory at the Tour of the Gila, Thompson appeared on Fox News and urged cyclists to “take a knee” – a gesture associated with the anti-racism movement launched by NFL player Colin Kaepernick in 2016 – in protest against the UCI’s inclusion policy and the presence of trans cyclists in women’s races.
Appearing on ‘Fox and Friends First’, the USA Bicycling Hall of Fame member said she was now asking “everybody to protest for the protection of women”.
However, Thompson’s recent tweets and public appearances have prompted Cynisca to end their association with the former pro, who they claimed was damaging the team’s “brand and reputation”, and merely using the squad as a “platform for her political activity”.
The team also accused Thompson of “dehumanising” transgender people and “spreading misinformation”, causing journalists to refuse to cover the team and leading potential staff members and riders to decline job offers “out of fear of crossing or appearing to align themselves with her”.
“Inga Thompson is no longer a member of the Cynisca board of directors and will have no consulting or any other role with Cynisca. The association with Ms Thompson has affected Cynisca’s brand and reputation,” the team announced in a statement.
> British Cycling's transgender and non-binary participation policy: a cyclist's experience
In the statement, Cynisca acknowledged that Thompson was appointed to the team’s board of directors thanks to her “impressive palmarés and a wealth of knowledge on international race strategy, tactics, and training.”
The team continued: “If shared in the absence of politics, her knowledge and experience would benefit many and advance cycling for everyone.
“However, she has decided to dedicate her time to excluding people that are otherwise and currently eligible to compete in UCI events. She has also attempted to use our team as a platform for her political activity.
“Ms Thompson's departure resolves a troubling conflict of interest. Cynisca is an apolitical organization, and her campaign and methods, by charter, UCI Code of Ethics, US law and decency, are not and will never be Cynisca's mission.
“To be clear, Ms Thompson is entitled to her opinions and advocacy, but her methods and personal attacks are inconsistent with Cynisca's mission to advance opportunities for women. Those methods, well-documented on Ms Thompson’s social media presence, include dehumanization of transgender people, spreading misinformation, demagoguery, and personal attacks on anyone who opposes her views.
“Our mission has been and always will be that of advancing women at all levels of cycling and doing so in a framework of equality, fairness, and tolerance. Despite the negativity fostered by Ms Thompson, we are succeeding and will push forward faster without her.”
> "Dumped by email": Mother of transgender cyclist Emily Bridges speaks out after British Cycling decision to suspend trans policy
In response to the team’s decision, Thompson tweeted this morning: “I was so excited for the maiden voyage and launch of Cynisca Cycling. One press release, a brief pause, and they’ve become the Titanic.”
Thompson’s departure from Cynisca comes a week after the 59-year-old described Austin Killips – who, by taking the GC at the Tour of the Gila, became the first transgender athlete to win a UCI women’s stage race – as “cycling’s equivalent of Lia Thomas”, the transgender swimmer who faced similar scrutiny after winning a US college women’s title last year.
Austin Killips, centre (Tour of the Gila)
“This really highlights the issues that are happening to women in cycling,” Thompson told the Telegraph. “We have more than 50 transgender women in the sport. And what’s going on in the background is that women are just quietly walking away. They think, ‘Why bother, if it's not fair?’”
The former 7-Eleven rider also claimed that there is a “lot of bullying” in women’s cycling over the trans issue, and that women who speak out “get cancelled, they get silenced, their jobs are threatened”.
She argued: “If they say anything, they are eviscerated. And so, instead of fighting this, they just walk away.”
On Fox News this week, Thompson said that the media “really has effectively shut down all dialogue about this and so many of us on the outside are trying to be this voice, to give the women the confidence to speak up without fear of losing their sponsorship.”
She continued: “That’s why we’re asking the owners of the team to step up and for fans to come and have an active support for these women so that we can have equality in women’s sports.
“With Austin winning, it has given women’s cycling a lot of visibility. We’re now asking everybody to protest for the protection of women… The science has been there for years and has been actively ignored because they would rather have inclusion than fairness for the women.”
> UCI to make "eventual decision" on transgender policy in August and will "take into account all elements" of heated debate
Following Killips’ win in New Mexico, the UCI announced that it recognised the concerns around the participation of transgender athletes in its events and that it has “agreed to debate and take an eventual decision” at the next meeting of the governing body’s management committee at August’s world championships in Glasgow.
According to the UCI’s current guidelines, trans women are allowed to compete in women’s competitions if their testosterone levels have been below 2.5 nanomoles per litre for at least 24 months.
In the immediate aftermath of Killips’ victory, the UCI defended its policy, stating that it “acknowledges that transgender athletes may wish to compete in accordance with their gender identity. The UCI rules are based on the latest scientific knowledge and have been applied in a consistent manner. The UCI continues to follow the evolution of scientific findings and may change its rules in the future as scientific knowledge evolves.”
However, two days later the governing body released another statement which appeared to indicate that it would reconsider its stance.
“The subject of the participation of transgender athletes in international competitions was discussed at the UCI Management Committee meeting,” it said.
“The Management Committee decided to analyse the current situation by reopening consultation with the athletes and National Federations, and therefore agreed to debate and take an eventual decision at its next meeting, in Glasgow, in August.
“The UCI's objective remains the same: to take into consideration, in the context of the evolution of our society, the desire of transgender athletes to practise cycling. The UCI also hears the voices of female athletes and their concerns about an equal playing field for competitors, and will take into account all elements, including the evolution of scientific knowledge.”
Add new comment
46 comments
You're absolutely right. That's why if you want to exclude trans women from competition you'd better be prepared to exclude anyone else who doesn't meet your ideal chromosome makeup. You wouldn't want any of those pesky women with enhanced natural testosterone levels polluting your competition, would you?
Trans women are women, just a different sort of woman.
There are a few vague figures floating around in this discussion.
The prevalence of true "intersex" (people whose sex is ambiguous from examination of genitalia, or whose sex based on examination is at odds with their sex chromosomes) is very very low. A good estimate is that 99.98% of humans are clearly male or female.
Variations in sex chromosome makeup have a prevalence of roughly 0.3%. Most of these wouldn't be considered intersex. Men with XXY (Klinefelter) or women with XO (Turner) are unambiguously male and female, at least based on traditional assessment by examination.
Apologies, but those links may only be accessible via academia.
More to the point, it is exceedingly rare for any of these conditions to confer any athletic advantage. Most either have no effect, or may bring various physical or cognitive disadvantages. Those that do confer an athletic advantage also cause clear ambiguity in sex.
Caster Semenya case really illustrates that. Her intersex condition and associated athletic advantage were identified by the simple question "does this person look like a woman?"
I am not aware of any intersex conditions in which a person can look female (at a simple glance, or by genital examination if really necessary) but also have an "unfair" advantage due to having higher testosterone levels or some other aspect of male physiology. I'd be interested to hear if anyone knows otherwise, but if I am correct then it is simply not necessary to consider chromosomal make-up in at least 99.98% of cases. Men and women can be categorised by their sex identifed (not assigned) at birth.
The rare exceptions will require careful and sensitive assessment. To use these as a reason to reject sex classification in sport is very much throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
There is no such thing as a cis woman. There are male and female. If you want to be named something else, fine, but you ieither male or female.
"there's lots of variations out there"
Evidence please. For the "lots" I mean.
It's actually very simple. Women's racing should be open to all women, cis or trans
It is simple, and no it shouldn't.
Trans women are women, just a different sort of woman
I could support that, except in sport and possibly prisons when the person in question is obviously a man. It's also probably the best solution in public toilets, because where else are the genetic males dressed as women going to 'go'?
Inga Thompson is on the right side of history here.
All sympathy to those who struggle with body issues. However, there is no equality or human rights objective that is served by allowing someone who developed as male and whose physiology would be a good-but-ordinary amateur in male sport, to compete in women's sport and suddenly be competitive at national or even international level.
Without prejudice to the respect everyone deserves for being able to live their life, it is unfair to developmental-females to to allow MtF trans-gender people to compete in their category. And there is no human right that requires it.
And I'm pretty confident society recognises this.
So, a women's cycling team sacks someone standing up for female athletes.
Hmm, ok...
I guess this team isn't actually interested in supporting female cyclists.
It does make you wonder if they are more interested in public opinion (and maybe what the sponsors target market is) than in really supporting female cyclists.
Where is the palmares for this Austin Killips person?
Nothing on Procycling Stats.
Oh well, I'm going to follow his lead and self-identify as a 10 year old girl and start smashing those kids in junior swimming now. Don't you dare misgender me!
What a cretinous comment.
Because you can't change when you were born, right?
Maybe they are recruiting a trans athlete with potential to win races
Cynisca's 'statement' is painful to read, waay too much time making sure all the keywords were included that it comes across as amateur virtuous ideological gibberish. Case in point: "...spreading misinformation, demagoguery, and personal attacks on anyone who opposes her views."
Cough cough, hypocrite much?
From the sound of Cynisca's excommunication sermon I would have expected Thompson's statements to be that of a raving bigot but all I saw was boring old logic and plain speak.
No, a team has parted ways with someone who was using the teams platform to push a discriminatory agenda. It's entirely possible to debate the transgender participation in sport without attacking transgender (or any other) people - it would seem that Inga was doing more than just questioning transgender participation.
Source?
Evidence for this?
It seems to be a common tactic to smear anyone who raises concerns about the inequity of permitting developmental-males into women's sports with all kinds of vague accusations of "hate", with no actual evidence.
So... evidence, or withdraw the slander.
Pages